Geological Disposal Feasibility studies exploring options for storage, transport and disposal of spent fuel from potential new nuclear power stations

This report is made available under the NDA Transparency Policy. In line with this policy, the NDA is seeking to make information on its activities readily available, and to enable interested parties to have access to and influence on its future programmes. The report may be freely used for non-commercial purposes. However as these studies were undertaken under contract to the Nuclear Industry Association, all commercial uses, including copying and re-publication, require permission from the Nuclear Industry Association. All copyright, database rights and other intellectual property rights reside with the Nuclear Industry Association. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in this publication, the NDA can not assume any responsibility for consequences that may arise from its use by other parties. Bibliography If you would like to see other reports available from NDA, a complete listing can be viewed at our website www.nda.gov.uk, or please write to the Library at the address below. Feedback Readers are invited to provide feedback to the NDA on the contents, clarity and presentation of this report and on the means of improving the range of NDA reports published. Feedback should be addressed to: iii Executive summary Background In 2009, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority's Radioactive Waste Management Directorate (RWMD) contributed to the Generic Design Assessment process for new nuclear reactor designs. RWMD undertook assessments under contract on behalf of Westinghouse and Electricité de France and Areva NP, to consider the disposability in a geological disposal facility of the higher activity wastes and spent nuclear fuel (SF) that would be expected to arise from operation and decommissioning of the AP 1000 and UK EPR reactor designs. RWMD concluded that given a disposal site with suitable characteristics, the wastes and SF from the new nuclear reactor designs are expected to be disposable. The assessments noted that compared to legacy wastes and SF, no new issues arise that challenge the fundamental disposability of the waste and SF arising from new nuclear power stations. However, due to the higher burn-up proposed for SF in new nuclear power stations, a longer period of cooling had been calculated to be necessary to meet criteria for emplacement in a geological disposal facility. The assessments identified that various opportunities exist to reduce the required cooling period by, for example, considering options for the packaging arrangement and disposal configuration. Subsequently, prospective new nuclear power station …